New Delhi: The CBI summoned former Mumbai NCB zonal director Sameer Wankhede for questioning on Thursday for allegedly looking for Rs 25 crore bribe for not framing actor Shah Rukh Khan’s son, Aryan Khan, within the Cordelia cruise ship drug bust case, information company PTI reported.
Wankhede, who has been booked together with 4 others within the case, is prone to seem earlier than the CBI in Mumbai, officers stated.
In keeping with particulars of the FIR, unbiased witness Okay P Gosavi and Prabhakar Sail, now deceased, had been included by the Narcotics Management Bureau (NCB) within the Cordelia cruise ship drug raid on October 2, 2021, on the instructions of Wankhede.
The CBI FIR talked about that this place “allowed KP Gosavi and his aide Sanvile D’Souza amongst others to enter into the conspiracy to extort an quantity of Rs. 25 crores from the relations of the alleged ‘accused’, Aryan Khan by threatening them of the accusation of offences of possession of Narcotics substances.”
“This quantity was lastly settled for Rs. 18 Crores. A token quantity of Rs. 50 Lakhs as bribe cash was additionally taken by KP Gosavi and his aide Sanvile D’Souza however later part of this quantity of Rs. 50 Lakhs bribe cash was returned again by them,” the FIR acknowledged.
Aryan Khan, who was formally arrested by the NCB on October 3, 2021, after a raid on the Cordelia cruise ship a day earlier than, was granted bail by the Bombay Excessive Court docket on October 28 after he had spent 25 days in jail. However his identify was not included within the checklist of accused within the NCB cost sheet for lack of proof.
The SET (particular enquiry workforce) in its findings, now a part of the FIR, stated Aryan Khan and different suspects had been delivered to the NCB workplace in Gosavi’s non-public automobile on October 2, 2021. Wankhede, within the capability of the rapid supervisory officer, had directed to take Gosavi and Sail because the unbiased witness within the proceedings towards the accused within the drug bust case, the FIR states.
He had directed then NCB superintendent V V Singh to let Gosavi “deal with the accused” whereas taking him to the NCB workplace, thereby “permitting a freehand” to him and others with the intention to create a visible impression that Gosavi had the custody of the accused, it stated.
“It appeared that the presence of the unbiased witness Gosavi round accused individuals was created deliberately in such a way in order to offer an impression that Gosavi was an NCB personnel despite the fact that there have been NCB personnel to deal with the custody of the accused individuals,” the FIR acknowledged.
Gosavi was allowed to be current within the firm of the accused individuals and even allowed to come back to the NCB workplace after the raid and took the liberty to click on selfies and recorded the voice word of an accused.
In different critical allegations, the FIR acknowledged how Sameer Wankhede “couldn’t sufficiently justify” acquired property as per declared revenue moreover not being about to “correctly clarify” his overseas visits and “apparently mis-declared the expenditure.”
The main points of FIR floor because the CBI carried out raids on the premises of Sameer Wankhede final week to probe the corruption case towards him in reference to the drugs-on-cruise case.
httpspercent3Apercent2Fpercent2Fnews.abplive.compercent2Fcrimepercent2Faryan-khan-drug-case-cbi-summons-ex-ncb-officer-sameer-wankhede-on-thursday-for-questioning-1603029
