I didn’t develop up in a movie-loving household – we hardly ever went to the cinema. Nonetheless, I had this unusual behavior as a younger teenager: I avidly learn French weekly Le Nouvel Observateur’s movie critiques. As soon as, I requested my dad and mom for permission to go and see Godard’s Pierrot le Fou. They mentioned: “Completely not.” I requested why. “As a result of it’s violent,” got here the reply. I lastly watched Pierrot le Fou once I studied on the nationwide movie faculty. The movie was not violent in the way in which they noticed it, however it was a shock, nonetheless. Little did I do know then that I might spend a couple of years working facet by facet with Jean-Luc Godard.
Actually, I began gravitating in direction of his circle from the time I used to be at movie faculty and thru my 20s, because of the good director of images William Lubtchansky, for whom I labored as an assistant. Lubtchansky had been the director of images for Godard, Agnès Varda, François Truffaut, Jacques Rivette, amongst different illustrious names of the French New Wave. All of them felt historical to me; nevertheless, they had been solely of their 50s and really a lot energetic. At movie faculty, we had imbibed the New Wave; they had been our masters of cinema. You needed to take sides, although. There have been the Rohmerian (after Eric Rohmer), the Godardian and the Truffaldian. I used to be a real Godardian. I used to be drawn to his radicalness. On the time, Godard and Truffaut had fallen out with one another, and would by no means patch their variations. The principle distinction between Godard and the others was how he made movies. Godard had his personal method of writing, producing, filming and modifying a movie. Moreover, not like different movie administrators of his technology, he didn’t consider in characters, he solely believed in actors responding to his directing.
I used to be 28 when les Cahiers du Cinéma despatched me on the movie set of Détective to do a photograph reportage. I used to be struck by how bodily Godard was. He hooked up a lot worth and significance to props, putting them rigorously on the set. To me, he regarded like a painter, overseeing the composition of a nonetheless life. I instructed him I believed he was a guide employee fairly than an mental. He smiled. I believe he appreciated that. The next summer season, he referred to as me. At first, I believed it was a joke. We met at his workplace. He mentioned: “I’m on the lookout for somebody who is aware of a bit however not an excessive amount of.” I mentioned sure instantly. He wanted a director of images by his facet full-time for a couple of years. He had many initiatives and commissions for tv, promoting and cinema, and I used to be to supervise the “picture” division, from the acquisition of apparatus to the lighting on his movies. This additionally meant typically being filmed by him whereas doing my job – in different phrases, enjoying my very own function. He additionally wished to look at each movie that was launched, and I needed to organize for this. Not a simple activity. I keep in mind we went collectively to see 4 movies in a day and there was a movie that he thought was so dangerous, he left the cinema actually crawling on the ground. It was a intestine response.
Movie was his complete life, there was little else beside it. He couldn’t even discover time to eat correctly. So far as I can recall, all he ate and drank had been omelettes and beer, and an apple for breakfast. He solely simply had time to go to the cafe and skim the newspaper every single day, however aside from that, cinema occupied all his ideas. I as soon as requested him how his movie pictures regarded so evidently “by Godard”. He replied, as a method of clarification: “It’s as a result of I body, whereas others principally reframe.” He drew each single shot of his movies in exact découpage. I’ve by no means skilled such a transparent and evident method of filming in a cinéaste. What was hanging too is that he talked little or no in regards to the previous, he was very a lot within the current, surrounded by a younger crew that gave him vitality but additionally a way of innocence.
Was he a troublesome man? He was very centered, exact, studious, always smoking his cigar and reflecting. He minimize a fairly solitary determine, expressing his emotions in silent methods. There was an awesome melancholy about him too; he saved saying “cinema is lifeless”. I used to be too younger to listen to this. After two years, I instructed him I wanted to interrupt aside, and unfold my wings. I labored with him once more within the early 90s and we usually noticed one another till he died. He selected to end his life by assisted dying, and I’m by no means shocked by his alternative. To check Godard to Picasso is suitable. At every of his totally different creative intervals, he recreated a complete new cinematic world.