I didn’t develop up in a movie-loving household – we not often went to the cinema. Nevertheless, I had this unusual behavior as a younger teenager: I avidly learn French weekly Le Nouvel Observateur’s movie critiques. As soon as, I requested my mother and father for permission to go and see Godard’s Pierrot le Fou. They mentioned: “Completely not.” I requested why. “As a result of it’s violent,” got here the reply. I lastly watched Pierrot le Fou once I studied on the nationwide movie faculty. The movie was not violent in the best way they noticed it, but it surely was a shock, nonetheless. Little did I do know then that I’d spend a number of years working aspect by aspect with Jean-Luc Godard.
In truth, I began gravitating in the direction of his circle from the time I used to be at movie faculty and thru my 20s, because of the good director of pictures William Lubtchansky, for whom I labored as an assistant. Lubtchansky had been the director of pictures for Godard, Agnès Varda, François Truffaut, Jacques Rivette, amongst different illustrious names of the French New Wave. All of them felt historic to me; nevertheless, they had been solely of their 50s and really a lot energetic. At movie faculty, we had imbibed the New Wave; they had been our masters of cinema. You needed to take sides, although. There have been the Rohmerian (after Eric Rohmer), the Godardian and the Truffaldian. I used to be a real Godardian. I used to be interested in his radicalness. On the time, Godard and Truffaut had fallen out with one another, and would by no means patch their variations. The principle distinction between Godard and the others was how he made movies. Godard had his personal method of writing, producing, filming and modifying a movie. Moreover, not like different movie administrators of his era, he didn’t consider in characters, he solely believed in actors responding to his directing.
I used to be 28 when les Cahiers du Cinéma despatched me on the movie set of Détective to do a photograph reportage. I used to be struck by how bodily Godard was. He connected a lot worth and significance to props, inserting them rigorously on the set. To me, he seemed like a painter, overseeing the composition of a nonetheless life. I advised him I assumed he was a handbook employee somewhat than an mental. He smiled. I believe he favored that. The next summer time, he referred to as me. At first, I assumed it was a joke. We met at his workplace. He mentioned: “I’m searching for somebody who is aware of a bit however not an excessive amount of.” I mentioned sure instantly. He wanted a director of pictures by his aspect full-time for a number of years. He had many initiatives and commissions for tv, promoting and cinema, and I used to be to supervise the “picture” division, from the acquisition of apparatus to the lighting on his movies. This additionally meant typically being filmed by him whereas doing my job – in different phrases, taking part in my very own position. He additionally needed to look at each movie that was launched, and I needed to prepare for this. Not a straightforward activity. I bear in mind we went collectively to see 4 movies in a day and there was a movie that he thought was so unhealthy, he left the cinema actually crawling on the ground. It was a intestine response.
Movie was his whole life, there was little else beside it. He couldn’t even discover time to eat correctly. So far as I can recall, all he ate and drank had been omelettes and beer, and an apple for breakfast. He solely simply had time to go to the cafe and browse the newspaper day-after-day, however other than that, cinema occupied all his ideas. I as soon as requested him how his movie photographs seemed so evidently “by Godard”. He replied, as a method of rationalization: “It’s as a result of I body, whereas others largely reframe.” He drew each single shot of his movies in exact découpage. I’ve by no means skilled such a transparent and evident method of filming in a cinéaste. What was hanging too is that he talked little or no in regards to the previous, he was very a lot within the current, surrounded by a younger crew that gave him vitality but in addition a way of innocence.
Was he a tough man? He was very centered, exact, studious, continuously smoking his cigar and reflecting. He reduce a somewhat solitary determine, expressing his emotions in silent methods. There was an amazing melancholy about him too; he saved saying “cinema is useless”. I used to be too younger to listen to this. After two years, I advised him I wanted to interrupt aside, and unfold my wings. I labored with him once more within the early 90s and we often noticed one another till he died. He selected to end his life by assisted dying, and I’m by no means shocked by his alternative. To check Godard to Picasso is suitable. At every of his totally different creative durations, he recreated a complete new cinematic world.