Home Entertainment Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial: jurors hear conflicting accounts of marriage

Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial: jurors hear conflicting accounts of marriage

by admin

Contradictory, explosive accounts of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s tumultuous three-year marriage have been introduced to jurors on the opening day of Depp’s libel case towards his ex-wife in a US court docket, with Depp’s attorneys accusing Heard of fabricating home violence claims towards him to advance her personal profession.

Heard’s attorneys, in the meantime, argued that her allegations are true, she had a proper to precise her views, “and all Mr Depp has needed to do is humiliate Amber, to hang-out her, to wreck her profession”.

Opposing profiles of the film stars – with Heard’s counsel presenting Depp as “an obsessed ex-husband hellbent on revenge” and Heard described as a lady who would “resort to bodily violence, throwing issues, to stop Mr Depp from leaving” – had been heard throughout opening statements.

“At present, his identify is related to a lie. A press release issued by his former spouse,” Depp’s lawyer Ben Chew stated on Tuesday. “You’ll be taught in the course of the trial that Miss Heard’s accusations had been prompted by Mr Depp’s request for a divorce.”

Amber Heard looks on inside the courtroom on 12 April.
Amber Heard appears to be like on contained in the courtroom on 12 April. {Photograph}: Reuters

Heard’s lawyer later stated they might current proof in the course of the trial to indicate that Depp had described “the violent aspect of himself because the monster” whereas participating in “crushing drug and alcohol abuse”.

“Amber Heard by no means needed to unearth for the general public who the true Johnny Depp is,” her lawyer Ben Rottenborn stated. “However that’s going to come back out over the course of this trial.”

The estranged couple arrived on the court docket in Fairfax, Virginia – Depp in a darkish blue go well with, black shirt and cream tie; Heard in a gray blazer along with her hair in a low bun – amid a throng of followers, whom they’ve each been instructed to keep away from.

Depp’s attorneys claimed Heard’s opinion article within the Washington Put up, printed on the eve of the cinema launch of Aquaman, through which she acted, “falsely and unfairly forged Mr Depp as a villain”. The actor, stated his lawyer Camille Vasquez, will “go to his grave understanding that no matter he does there’ll all the time be individuals who consider he abused a lady”.

Vasquez additionally accused Heard of stagecraft. “She has been dwelling and respiratory this lie for years now,” she stated. “She is making ready to offer the efficiency of a lifetime on this trial.”

Heard’s lawyer’s countered that Depp’s accusations towards his ex-wife had been designed to “mislead you” and their shopper’s case was about her proper to free speech beneath the primary modification.

“That’s what you’re being requested to determine,” stated J Ben Rottenborn, an lawyer for Heard. The lawyer additionally famous that Depp is making an attempt to show “the phrases Miss Heard used had been about him and had been false … and he can’t do this”.

“Mr Depp’s staff goes to attempt to flip this case right into a cleaning soap opera. Why, I’m unsure, as a result of the proof isn’t fairly for Mr Depp.”

The mudslinging, which can most likely final seven weeks, is unlikely to do both actor’s profession any favors.

Each declare their reputations have been considerably broken by the opposite, however it’s Depp who introduced the defamation motion on the premise of the 2018 Washington Put up article through which Heard wrote about home violence in direction of girls – and implied, in line with Depp, that he was the perpetrator.

Depp, 58, is suing Heard, 35, for $50m over the article; Heard is counter-suing for $100m. For Depp to prevail, jurors should “show by clear and convincing proof” that Heard knowingly made false claims – a typical of proof that’s typical of civil instances and is considerably much less rigorous that “past affordable doubt”.

Trial observers have famous that Depp isn’t suing the Washington Put up itself, which some have stated means that his motion might not be essentially about libel, however concerning the messy finish of a turbulent marriage acted out in public.

“These fictitious claims had been by no means made on the onset of Amber’s allegations in 2016, and solely advantageously surfaced years later as soon as she was sued for defamation after noting in her op-ed that she was a sufferer of ‘sexual violence”, a spokesperson for Depp stated later.

“This follows a sample of her elaborate, misguided claims which have continued to vary and evolve over time for the aim of Hollywood shock worth of which Amber has mastered and used to take advantage of a severe social motion,” they added.

Some well-known faces are anticipated to testify, together with the actor Paul Bettany, who texted with Depp about Heard; the actor James Franco, who allegedly as soon as requested Heard about bruises on her face after a row with Depp; the actor Ellen Barkin; and the Tesla CEO, Elon Musk, who’s Heard’s former boyfriend.

Source link

You may also like

Leave a Comment