Home NewsAsia Kanjhawala Case: 2 Accused Implicated Under Sections Related To Destruction Of Evidence, Crimin

Kanjhawala Case: 2 Accused Implicated Under Sections Related To Destruction Of Evidence, Crimin

by admin
Kanjhawala Case: 2 Accused Implicated Under Sections Related To Destruction Of Evidence, Crimin

The opposite two accused Ashutosh and Ankush within the Kanjhawala hit and drag case have been implicated underneath sections associated to the destruction of proof, prison conspiracy and different offences, as reported by the information company ANI. The case pertains to the homicide of a 20-year-old girl in Delhi. She was dragged for 13 kilometres on New 12 months’s Day. 

Anjali Singh was using her scooter house along with her buddy Nidhi after a New 12 months’s Eve celebration when she was hit by a car shortly after 2 a.m. Anjali’s leg grew to become entangled in one of many automotive’s wheels, and he or she was carried away by the car. Even when the passengers observed her arm underneath the wheels, they didn’t come to a halt. The boys drove for over an hour till the physique slid off.

Delhi police are more likely to file a chargesheet in opposition to the accused individuals within the case in Rohini District courtroom on Saturday. Police might file the chargesheet underneath sections of homicide, prison conspiracy, and destruction of proof together with different sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Delhi police have already invoked part 302 IPC within the FIR. Initially, the FIR was registered underneath sections 120B, 304, 279 and 201 and different sections of the IPC. Seven accused individuals have been arrested in reference to the case, of whom two have been later granted bail. The accused — Manoj Mittal, Deepak Khanna, Amit Khanna, Krishan and Mithun — have been arrested on January 1. They’re in judicial custody following interrogation, as reported by ANI.

The opposite two accused, Ashutosh and Ankush, have been arrested afterward. The investigating officer will file the chargesheet earlier than the metropolitan Justice of the Peace Sanya Dalal. In what was a stunning incident on the Shani Bazar Street, the sufferer was dragged 13 kilometres underneath a automotive. The accused drove round within the automotive for 2 hours, Delhi police had submitted whereas searching for the remand of the accused individuals.

The CCTV footage and Name Element Report (CDR) collected in the course of the investigation could also be essential proof disclosure within the chargesheet. Delhi police had additionally submitted that the accused, Deepak, was planted by the opposite accused individuals within the case. Delhi police had submitted that the CCTV footage was collected from a petroleum pump and a spot the place the accused took meals.

The IO had instructed the courtroom earlier that Deepak was behind the wheels of the car. Afterward, it was revealed by means of the CDR that he was planted as an accused as he has a driving licence. Particular public prosecutor (SPP) Atul Srivastava additionally submitted that the part of homicide was added within the FIR as they’d the information {that a} physique was underneath the car and nonetheless stored on driving. It confirmed their intention, police claimed.

The SPP additional submitted {that a} part of the destruction of proof underneath part 201 of IPC was additionally invoked because the accused planted a person, who was not driving the automotive. It was additionally submitted by SPP Shrivastav that each one the accused individuals dedicated the offence in a deliberate method due to which their offence attracted a piece of prison conspiracy underneath 120B of IPC.




You may also like

Leave a Comment