Home NewsAsia Kiren Rijiju Removed As Law Minister, Replaced By Arjun Ram Meghwal

Kiren Rijiju Removed As Law Minister, Replaced By Arjun Ram Meghwal

by admin
Kiren Rijiju Removed As Law Minister, Replaced By Arjun Ram Meghwal

In a significant growth, Kiren Rijiju has been eliminated because the regulation minister and has now been assigned cost of the Ministry Of Earth Sciences. He has been changed by Arjun Ram Meghwal. Rashtrapati Bhawan in an announcement mentioned, “Arjun Ram Meghwal, Minister of State assigned the unbiased cost as Minister of State within the Ministry of Legislation and Justice along with his current portfolios, instead of Kiren Rijiju. The portfolio of Ministry of Earth Sciences be assigned to Kiren Rijiju.”

Reacting to the event, Rijiju has mentioned the change has been made in view of the upcoming elections.

Arjun Ram Meghwal, 70 years, is a three-time MP from Bikaner and in 2019, he defeated Madan Gopal Meghwal of the Congress by a margin of two.64 lakh votes. Meghwal is presently the Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs and the Minister of State for Tradition. 

He was additionally the Chief Whip of the BJP within the Lok Sabha and has been in energetic politics for 14 years. A former IAS officer, he got here into politics with voluntary retirement. He was awarded the Finest Parliamentarian Award in 2013.

Off late, Rijiju had been vocal about his opinion on the tussle between the chief and the judiciary over the process of appointment of the judges. He additionally criticised the collegium system to nominate judges on a number of events.

Ealier this yearm Rijiju mentioned judges have been nonetheless topic to public scrutiny regardless of not having to take part in elections. “Individuals are watching you… the judgments you give, how you’re employed… On this age of social media, you’ll be able to’t cover something,” he mentioned.

Democracy is not going to succeed if we weaken the independence of the judiciary or cut back its authority, respect and dignity,” he mentioned. 

“There have been many adjustments since 1947, so it will be flawed to assume that the present system will keep it up and it will by no means be questioned. It’s the altering scenario which dictates the necessity and because of this the Structure needed to be amended greater than 100 occasions,” he added.

Rijiju sought to help the views of a retired excessive courtroom choose who claimed that the Supreme Court docket “hijacked” the Structure by deciding to nominate judges itself.





You may also like

Leave a Comment